Video: Labor and Liberal politicians make $millions from the AUKUS money train

This informative report provides evidence of the personal gain made by certain political figures out of the AUKUS deal. One of them is former Prime Minister Scott Morrison, who is the new CEO for an American owned company contracted to supply components for the nuclear submarines tied to the deal. There are other’s including one or two who used to represent the Labor Party. Talk about corruption in politics. And the submarines may not even be delivered, although the taxpayer still gets to pay for them – and the gravy train for the politicians in for a cut in the action. This is worthwhile viewing.

Video from the Kangaroo Court of Australia

1 Comment on "Video: Labor and Liberal politicians make $millions from the AUKUS money train"

  1. Libby Mitchell | 10 October 2024 at 8:25 am | Reply

    This is the first time I have heard and clearly understood what I was being told about AUKUS. This video MUST be seen by more Australians. Please watch the whole reel…especially Shoebridge’s analyses of the contract that run from about 4 mins in! I cannot believe how unwise and high-risk the contract was that Morrison agreed to – but he is now making money from – when it is highly likely that Australia will never get any submarines and will be stuck with the nuclear waste – to make Perth especially a nuclear target.
    If others have more information to counter these extraordinary claims [that should be respected and closely examined perhaps as being accurate, since David Shoebridge is a trained barrister] – please give “the other side” NOW – if there IS one.
    Meanwhile thanks to Kangaroo Court for exposing this issue in a way that Australians can hopefully comprehend. No wonder mainstream media has avoided letting us all know, more clearly! Morrison and other LNP involvement could be expected as being dodgy thinking back – but I am shocked that ALP and Albanese are also linked to this apparent rort. Meanwhile, the Greens are forever “bashed” in the media? I truly wonder WHY – IF this report can be subtantiated, as it seems that it can and SHOULD be.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.